There is a strange tension that comes with writing about theatre.
We love theatre. We love the people who give their time, talent, evenings, and weekends to create it. We understand how much work happens behind every performance—months of rehearsal, late nights, nervous actors, exhausted directors, and crews solving problems the audience may never see.
And then we sit down to write a review.
That’s where honesty matters.
A theatre review shouldn’t exist simply to make everyone feel good. It should tell the truth about what an audience experienced.
That doesn’t mean being cruel. It means respecting the production—and the audience—enough to be honest.
Praise Without Honesty Isn’t Really Praise
In a small theatre community, it can be tempting to give every production a glowing review. We know the actors. We know the directors. We know how hard everyone worked.
But if every show is described as “phenomenal,” “brilliant,” or “spectacular,” those words eventually lose their meaning.
An honest review is fair to everyone.
It’s fair to the audience, who deserves to know what they’re spending their time and money to see. It’s fair to performers, who deserve meaningful feedback. And it’s fair to the production itself.
Theatre is a living art form. It should be allowed to be imperfect.
Criticism Isn’t Cruelty
There is a difference between criticizing a performance and criticizing a person.
A reviewer can say that the pacing was slow without saying the director is incompetent. They can point out that a performance lacked consistency without declaring an actor untalented.
The key is being specific.
Instead of saying, “The acting was terrible,” explain what didn’t work. Instead of saying, “The show was boring,” discuss the pacing, staging, storytelling, or energy that contributed to that experience.
Specific criticism can be useful.
Cruel criticism isn’t.
The Audience Deserves the Truth
A review isn’t simply a piece of advertising.
Someone reads a review, buys a ticket, rearranges their schedule, finds childcare, or drives across town. They deserve an honest assessment of what they’re going to experience.
A good reviewer asks more than, “Did I like it?”
They ask, “Did it work?”
Those are very different questions.
Art is subjective, and reviewers will have different opinions. But those opinions should be grounded in what actually happened onstage.
Honest Reviews Strengthen Theatre
Honest criticism can actually be one of the greatest compliments a production receives.
When we point out both strengths and weaknesses, we’re saying the work deserves to be taken seriously.
Maybe the second act needs tighter pacing. Maybe the sound needs adjustment. Maybe an actor needs to trust their character more. Maybe the set is beautiful but overwhelms the performers.
These aren’t attacks. They’re part of the artistic conversation.
Theatre cannot grow if everyone is afraid to say what isn’t working.
Community theatre deserves thoughtful criticism, too. The fact that many people volunteer their time makes their commitment admirable—but it doesn’t make the audience’s experience any less important.
We can appreciate the sacrifice and acknowledge the shortcomings.
Both things can be true.
The Fifth Row’s Promise
At The Fifth Row, we believe theatre deserves respect.
That means respecting the artists who create it and the audiences who support it.
We don’t believe every show needs to be perfect. We don’t believe every performance needs five stars. And we don’t believe a negative observation automatically makes a review negative.
Honesty isn’t the enemy of theatre.
Dishonesty is.
When reviews become nothing more than promotional material, criticism loses its purpose. But when criticism is honest, specific, fair, and rooted in respect, it becomes part of the craft.
Theatre asks actors to be vulnerable enough to tell the truth onstage.
Perhaps those of us sitting in the fifth row should be willing to do the same.
The Fifth Row 
Leave a comment